The tragic earthquake in Haiti has brought up the subject of nonprofit overhead. Here’s an example of a tweet on the subject which was posted today:
Another false meme: “100% of Yele proceeds go to THE PEOPLE” – 2005: 61%; 2006: 65%; 2007: 73%
Seems like a logical complaint – if I’m donating to aid in Haiti, I want my money to go to Haitians. The same complaint occurs all across the nonprofit sector. People want their money to go directly to the cause, with no cuts taken for bureaucracy and inefficiency. But, when you talk to folks who have worked at nonprofits, you hear a much different story.
The word for this type of giving is “restricted.” Restricted giving is popular and common, but it’s actually the least helpful type of giving you can do. The fact is that it takes many people to run a nonprofit organization, and what seems like bureaucracy to you is actually salaries, benefits, and the savings accounts which give organizations a buffer so they don’t have to lay people off in hard times. Most nonprofits run incredibly lean – minimal salaries, minimal benefits, few perks – but the people who run nonprofits are the ones making the biggest positive impact on our society and our world.
When you give to an organization, please specify that you prefer that your gift be “unrestricted,” essentially meaning that you trust the people who run that organization to use it in the most effective way possible to serve their mission. Sometimes that means taking money that would otherwise go directly to Haitians, and using it to raise the salary of the call center staffer who is fielding reports of injury and death all day long, or increase his benefits to include counseling services.
Think about it.

