The geekling’s three other parents and I have been looking at different schools for her in Seattle. It’s been an interesting process. So interesting, in fact, that it’s (you guessed it) bloggable.

The first parent tour we went on was the Seattle Waldorf School, and boy are they a trip! We had some idea of the Waldorf curriculum going in. We dutifully read the full-color glossy book they had sent to our house a few weeks earlier. We’d poked around the website. We liked the idea that the kids have the same class and teacher through all of 1st-8th grade. We liked the idea of a well-researched, pre-set curriculum. The geekling is in Suzuki violin, after all, so we’re no stranger to strict lesson plans with lots of parent involvement.
We got there and were taken to the music room (all Waldorf kids learn to play violin, so it was stuffed with string instruments), and encouraged to look at laminated books of classroom work produced by different grade levels. The very polite and perky admissions officer told us that these books contained the best work produced by Waldorf students. She seemed to think this was something to be proud of. It sounded more to us like an apologetic admission that not all of their students produce this level of work.
There was also propaganda from the national Waldorf organization, one with a sexy headshot of Julianna Margulies and a blockquote about how much Waldorf education had taught her about critical thinking. That’s good, we thought, our daughter could be an actress who’s good at critical thinking!
That’s when we got off on the wrong foot. My partner Brian has mild dyslexia and a hand tremor, and depends heavily on typing and spell-check in order to be the fantastic writer that he is. He has built much of his career around securing accessible technology for people with disabilities so that they can participate in the internet and democracy and all that tasty stuff. Brian’s first question for the admissions director was naturally about technology in the classroom.
Little did we know, the subject of technology is in fact a minefield in Waldorf education. They have zero technology in the curriculum until high school. The admissions director got rather defensive, picked up one of the display books of student work, and delivered a short lecture/sermon on how important handwriting is to human development. I hadn’t realized until she said it that the workbooks, even the high school ones, were entirely done by hand. Not one typed word, not one photograph.
We bit our tongues and looked slightly shocked as this poor woman who had just essentially told Brian that he could never become a fully developed human being tucked a wisp of hair back behind her ear and asked for more questions. She didn’t know. Technology is not a dealbreaker, we thought. If there’s one experience the geekling will go into adolescence lacking, it ain’t technology.
Then we went on the classroom tours. It became obvious that they had orchestrated our arrival in certain classrooms at certain times. The whole thing felt more like a performance than an observation. The math and history lessons we watched seemed academically solid and very engaging. The classroom sizes were strange though. They only have one classroom for each grade, but some classrooms had 12 kids, and some had 29, some skewed heavily toward girls, some heavily toward boys. There was about one token minority kid in each classroom. It gave the impression that they accept everyone who applies, and if they get all white kids, then they find somebody who knows a minority kid and beg them to take a full-ride scholarship. I’m sure that’s not true, but that’s the impression the demographics led to.
We went to the kindergarten classroom last, and learned that, although Waldorf kids spend two years in kindergarten, they learn zero academics. It then occurred to me that we had seen virtually no reading and writing in the lower grade classrooms we had visited.
After the tour, since the geekling will be going into second grade, we asked to see the first grade classroom (which will be the second grade classroom next year), and we were told that was not allowed. The perky lady would be happy to introduce us to the first grade teacher at the open house later in the year, but the first grade classroom was not “ready to be observed”.
Throughout the tour, Denise, the geekling’s bio-mom (one-fourth of our super-hero parenting team), continually commented on the style in which the walls were painted. Not being a painting or home-improvement person myself, I had no idea what she was talking about.
Well, it turns out that the style of wall painting is in fact a hallmark of Waldorf schools called lazuring, and Denise’s investigation of it turned over all sorts of interesting things about the Waldorf philosophy that weren’t highlighted in the glossy catalogs. It turns out that it’s actually really controversial.
It’s not just technology that younger kids are shooed away from. It’s also strange stuff like black crayons. Here is Waldorf-founder Rudolph Steiner on the color black:
Now submerge yourself in black; you are completely surrounded by black–in this black darkness a physical being can do nothing. Life is driven out of the plant when it becomes carbon. Black shows itself alien to life, hostile to life; when plants are carbonized they turn black. Life, then can do nothing in blackness. And the soul? Our soul life deserts us when this awful blackness is within us.
According to Open Waldorf, younger Waldorf students generally aren’t allowed to use the color black, and are encouraged to wait until they are older to even draw specific forms.
The first Waldorf school was opened in 1920 with the intent to create adults who could live independently. This is why they taught house-building, farming, spinning, and knitting in addition to traditional academics. Unfortunately, the founder died in 1925. Waldorf schools today, rather than holding true to the vision of independent adults and evolving their curriculum to new definitions of independence, have instead held true to their curriculum are giving the adults of 2020 the skills that the adults of 1920 required. An adult today with nothing in life but the skills of 1920 would be begging on the street. An adult today with a decent command of Outlook, Excel, and social networking has the beginnings of a career.
All in all, I don’t think we’ll be applying. There are some good things about Waldorf. It’s definitely different, and our educational system could certainly use a shakeup. But I felt like I was given a dog and pony show during the tour, and I don’t have confidence that the curriculum will be competitive at the college level.
Have you been to a Waldorf school? Know someone who has? Leave a comment with your impressions.
-
Jeff
-
Jeff
-
http://sarahdavies.cc/2008/10/29/giddens-school/ Giddens School | Sarah Davies
-
http://sarahdavies.cc/2008/11/07/spruce-street-school/ Spruce Street School | Sarah Davies
-
Carlo
-
Carlo
-
Sabine
-
Sabine
-
Sara
-
Sara
-
Ann
-
Ann
-
Ann
-
Ann
-
Ann
-
Nate
-
Nate
-
Jesse Michener
-
Jesse Michener
-
Jesse Michener
-
Melvin
-
Melvin
-
http://smrtlernins.com/2010/11/16/ask-a-smrt-homeschooler-about-the-waldorf-method/ “Ask a [Smrt] Homeschooler” about the Waldorf method » Smrt Lernins
-
PK
-
Margaret Sachs
-
Trevor
-
josh
-
guest
-
Student
-
Another Student
-
Another Student
-
patti
-
Tristeaux1
-
Tristeaux1
-
Diddybop